Chuck Jaffee, a forty-year veteran financial journalist who regularly writes for the Wall Street Journal and is also a nationally syndicated financial columnist, discusses how money and investors’ attitude towards investing has changed over the last few decades.
Tag: investing
#388: “Feeling Anxious About Your Investments?”, with Scott Nations
Recessions are terrifying.
Market crashes often bring out the worst in people’s anxieties and fears.
This fear triggers us to act even more irrationally than usual – which can lead to making expensive mistakes in our investment portfolios.
In today’s episode, Scott Nations, who spent his career studying market volatility, describes some of the most common cognitive biases and irrational behaviors that investors make. He shares tips on how to master the mental game of investing, especially in turbulent times.
Here are a few irrational biases that destroy wealth:
#1: The disposition effect – Humans have a tendency to sell their winners and hold their losers.
Why? We get a dopamine hit when we sell a winning asset and lock in our gains. Meanwhile, sunk cost fallacy makes us want to hang onto the loser ‘until it comes back.’
How can we avoid falling prey to this?
First, if you’re thinking about selling off an asset that’s performing well, ask yourself: What’s the real motivation? Do you want to book a profit for the sake of booking a profit? Or do you believe that some underlying fundamental has changed?
Next, compare this decision to your investor policy statement, which is your written statement about your goals, timeline, risk tolerance, risk capacity, strategy and style as an investor. Is this decision aligned with your written personal policies?
#2: Status quo bias – Our tendency to overvalue our current situation, such as the mix of assets that happens to already be inside our portfolio. We demand a higher burden of proof to justify any change than we do to justify holding the status quo.
This is often triggered by information overload – when we feel overwhelmed by excess information and too many options, we react by doing nothing.
Psychologist Barry Schwartz calls this the “paradox of choice” – the more choices we’re offered, the more likely we are to not make any decision.
How can we protect ourselves from this? One tactic is to adopt a low-information diet, in which we carefully curate the amount of news and information that we receive.
Another tactic is to look at our resources and imagine that we’re starting from a blank slate. If we didn’t have our current mix of stocks, bonds, real estate, crypto, etc. – if we imagine that we’re starting with our entire net worth in cash – how would we allocate our capital if we were starting from scratch?
#3: Overconfidence – Research shows that people consistently overestimate both their abilities and their predictions of positive future outcomes.
The majority of people think they’re an above-average driver, which is mathematically impossible.
Most people overestimate their probability of getting and staying married forever, of not grappling with fertility issues, choosing a winning investment, or becoming a millionaire.
Today’s interview guest says that he’s aware that, among all the cognitive biases he describes, he’s personally the most susceptible to overconfidence bias. Staying aware of his personal susceptibility helps him keep it in check.
#4: Loss aversion – The sting of a loss is more emotionally profound than the joy of a gain. As a result, our brains are hardwired to avoid losses, rather than pursue gains.
This closely relates to the sunk cost fallacy that fuels the disposition effect, which we described above.
We describe many more cognitive biases in today’s episode. Enjoy!
#387: Ask Paula: Is A Crash Coming??
Lila is concerned about inflation and the risk of a recession. Should she invest in the stock market, despite the scary headlines? Or should she pay off her primary residence or her investment properties?
Linda invested in a 529 for her son’s college, and he’ll be starting in the fall. But, the value of the plan dropped right before she was planning on using it and she is wondering how to keep from losing more money.
Jen and her husband want to retire in 8 years. They’re hoping to have paid off their mortgage AND hit their net worth goals when they stop working. How should they prioritize between these two goals?
Do you have a question on business, money, trade-offs, financial independence strategies, travel, or investing? Leave it here and we’ll answer them in a future episode.
Enjoy!
#382: Ask Paula: There’s No Such Thing as a FIRE Number
Sara wants to leave her job to spend time with her children, and she needs help in calculating her FIRE number. But is this possible?
Joe is buying his first house hack and would like to understand if the FHA loan or the doctor loan would be better for him.
Kat received a windfall and is wondering if she should invest it in stocks, real estate, or a combination of both.
Aisha is moving to the US and wants to start investing ASAP – how should she approach her goal to reach FIRE?
Former financial planner Joe Saul-Sehy and I tackle these questions in today’s episode.
Enjoy!
P.S. Got a question? Leave it here.
#377: How I Discovered The 4 Percent Retirement Rule, with Bill Bengen
Today’s episode is sheer retirement nerd bliss.
We talk to the creator of the 4 percent retirement safe withdrawal rule, Bill Bengen.
If you’re new to retirement planning, you might not yet grasp the gravity of this. Let’s cut to the chase: the 4 percent rule is one of the most revolutionary, groundbreaking insights in the field of retirement research in the past 30 years.
To understand why, let’s climb in our time machines and return to 1994.
Back then, many financial advisors were telling their clients that they could safely withdraw 7 percent of their retirement portfolio each year.
After all, the simplistic logic went, the stock market has historically yielded between 7 to 9 percent returns, so that type of withdrawal rate shouldn’t dwindle the principle … right? ⠀
⠀
Bill Bengen, an MIT graduate and former rocket scientist, decided to build a better model. He looked at the performance of investment portfolios across 30-year time horizons, beginning in 1926.
Under the assumption that the portfolio is invested 50 percent in an S&P 500 Index and 50 percent in intermediate-term bonds, in a tax deferred account, he found that retirees could only withdraw 4.2 percent of their portfolio in the first year of retirement, and that amount adjusted for inflation each subsequent year.
He called this the “safe withdrawal rate” that gave people a reasonable chance of not outliving their money, based on historic performance.
He published the results in the Journal of Financial Planning and caused a stir. This was revolutionary. It upended the assumptions that dominated the field at the time.
And it remains a cornerstone of retirement planning to this day.
We talk to Bill Bengen about his discovery – and his latest research – in today’s episode.
#369: Why Does the Stock Market Crash? Stocks 101 Explained, with Brian Feroldi
Why does the stock market rise? Why does it crash? Why does it recover?
To answer these questions, we need a deep, tree-trunk understanding – a core, fundamental understanding – of how the stock market operates.
What, exactly, IS a stock – and how are stocks valued? What’s the difference between the Dow Jones, the S&P 500, and the Nasdaq? Why is the market a voting machine in the short-term, but a weighing machine in the long-term?
Brian Feroldi, the author of “Why Does the Stock Market Go Up?,” joins us for a Stocks 101 explainer episode.
If you’d like a deeper understanding of the world of stocks, you’ll enjoy this explainer episode.
And if you have a friend/spouse/coworker who’s said, “I need to learn more about investing,” share this episode with them.
Enjoy!
#366: Ask Paula: How Do I Invest For My Parents’ Retirement?
Micheal’s parents just sold their home to pay off debt and fund their retirement. How should he invest the profits?
Ryker would like to understand what it would take for cryptocurrency to be considered as a good investment option for a diversified portfolio.
Megan has qualified for her employer’s 401k and needs help deciding between […]
#358: Ask Paula: Should I Invest in Index Funds More Actively?
Where is the balance between the risks and potential returns of actively and passively investing in index funds?
Where do you place your savings after you max out your retirement and HSA accounts?
How do you finance building a rental unit when there’s already a home on the lot?
Is it more beneficial to buy back pension time with post tax deductions or a 457b plan? Or should I not buy back pension time at all?
In today’s episode, former financial planner Joe Saul-Sehy and I discuss the purpose and practice of mindful money.
Do you have a question on business, money, trade-offs, financial independence strategies, travel, or investing? Leave it here and we’ll answer them in a future episode.
Enjoy!
#357: Practical Investing and the Efficient Frontier, with Joe Saul-Sehy
Discussing advanced investing topics with me is former financial planner Joe Saul-Sehy.
You may recognize him from the Ask Paula episodes, but we discuss financial topics shared in his new book “STACKED: Your Super-Serious Guide to Modern Money Management” – co-authored with Emily Guy Birken.
Enjoy!
#347: The Radical Invention of the Index Fund, with Robin Wigglesworth
.
In today’s episode, we learn about the revolutionary ideas that paved the path to passive investing.
We learn about the radical invention of the index fund.
We discover the drama, the tenacity, the betrayal and redemption behind it.
And we discover the lessons that the history of the index fund holds.
Enjoy!