Finance nerds have strange habits.
Here’s one of mine:
Once a year, I lock myself in a room with nothing but a laptop, spreadsheet, and boatloads of determination.
The mission: Decipher my savings rate.
Am I saving 30 percent of my income? 40 percent? 60 percent?
As longtime readers might recall, Will and I saved half of our income in 2012. We did it by following one simple rule: Pretend we’re a one-income couple. Live entirely on one partners’ salary, and invest 100 percent of the others’.
Since we earned roughly the same amount, we ended up investing about 50 percent of our income in 2012.
In 2013, we didn’t follow any strict rules about spending from one bank account or the other. But both of our earnings escalated, and I suspected this might translate into a turbocharged savings rate.
(After all, the best way to fast-track your savings is by earning more, and saving every dime of that extra income.)
I crunched the numbers, and made two shocking discoveries:
- We have a 77% savings rate
- That statistic is meaningless
Here’s why that factoid is crap – and how to find the metric that really matters.
Measure the Metric That Matters
I don’t want to wax philosophical – at least, not too much.
But before this conversation can continue, we need to discuss an important question: What are “savings?”
Is saving the absence of spending? Is it the money that’s left over at the end of the month?
– Or –
Is it cash that’s set aside for a specific goal?
If so — Does the timeline of that goal matter? Does it qualify as “savings” if the goal is five years away? Five months? Five days? What’s the cutoff?
Furthermore, does the content of the goal matter? Are certain goals, like retirement, more worthwhile? What about world travel – is this a worthy goal, or a frivolous expense?
You can see where the definition of “savings” gets hazy.
Here’s the crux of the problem:
“Savings” is money that you’re setting aside for the future. Which means that “savings” is deferred spending.
When you save money, you’re saying: “I’ll spend this later.”
But spending later won’t get you closer to financial freedom.
There’s a better metric that we can track — one that’s even more important than savings.
(We’ll come back to that metric in a moment.)
Back to my meaningless savings rate.
This issue arose during a conversation with a friend who happens to work as a financial planner.
We were chatting about income (yeah, I’m a fun conversationalist) and he asked how much I had saved in the past year.
I took out my laptop, showed him the spreadsheet … and drew a blank.
Because here’s what it says:
Look at that second line-item: “Pay Cash for 2 Cars.”
Last year, Will and I both paid cash for our cars. I bought a 5-year-old Honda Civic; he bought a 7-year-old Acura.
Is this “savings,” because we saved enough money to buy cars in cash? Or is this “spending,” because we spent the money on cars?
“It’s savings,” my financial planner friend remarked. “‘Spending’ is month-to-month.”
I contemplated that remark for a long time. I’m not sure if I agree — but then, it doesn’t matter.
Because within those reflections, I realized: We’re discussing the wrong metric.
Savings won’t bring you financial freedom. Investing will.
That’s the metric we should track.
Savings Are Awesome … But Investing is the Real Mack Daddy
Savings are great. They help you pay for big-ticket items like cars, graduate school, medical bills, world travel and a wedding.
But savings – alone – won’t help you achieve the nexus of all freedoms.
“Savings” is a feel-good word that means, “I’ll spend this money later.” While that’s great for buying big-ticket stuff, it won’t move the needle on creating your life’s freedom.
It won’t help you reach the 4 Types of Retirement.
“Investing,” on the other hand, allows you to grow your assets and passive income. This creates freedom.
If my mission is to track my progress towards Financial Freedom, I need to throw away my so-called savings rate, and focus on my investing rate.
I tightened those line-items into a more condensed version. Here’s the breakdown:
Let’s attack this.
“Cash” represents money that will morph into cars, refrigerators and other junk that doesn’t command a return. Sure, these purchases are important — I need a fridge to keep my food cold — but it won’t move the needle.
Let’s throw it out.
Next, let’s look at the “Health Savings” line.
Prior to a few months ago, I would have thrown out that line for the same reason – this money will get spent on wisdom tooth extractions and blood tests. (Those are important expenses, for sure, but our mission is to track financial freedom.)
But then I read an awesome article from the Mad FIentist on How to Hack Your HSA. He advised leaving your money inside your HSA, so that it can continue to grow tax-deferred. Pay out-of-pocket for medical costs. Keep your receipts, so that you can withdraw the cash whenever you choose. But conceptualize the HSA an a “bonus” retirement account.
Brilliant idea. I can’t believe I didn’t think of that.
So my total retirement investing rate is:
Next come the extra mortgage payments. I’m paying down my rental properties (so that they’ll produce even stronger passive income.) Extra principal payments comprised 14 percent of my income last year.
What happens when we add these figures?
Now we’re reading the metric that matters.
We’re focused on investing, not savings.
And that’s what moves the needle.